Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2008 04:27:46 -0400 From: Michael Powell <nightrecon@verizon.net> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: IPFW: Is keep/check-state inherent? Message-ID: <g9b065$vns$1@ger.gmane.org> References: <48B83820.8040200@ibctech.ca>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Steve Bertrand wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I can't recall for certain, but not so long ago, I either read or heard > about IPFW having implicit keep-state and check-state. > > Is it true that I can now omit these keywords in my rulesets? > Haven't used IPFW in years so I do not know about IPFW. However, this is the case for the lastest pf upgrade/import from OpenBSD. For pf now I think you need no state if you want to disable, as keep state is "on" by default now. -Mike
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?g9b065$vns$1>