From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Mar 24 06:20:08 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7224F16A4D0
	for <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org>;
	Wed, 24 Mar 2004 06:20:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from plewe.is.tsukuba.ac.jp (plewe.is.tsukuba.ac.jp
	[130.158.81.199])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FF2443D1D
	for <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org>;
	Wed, 24 Mar 2004 06:20:07 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from till@plewe.is.tsukuba.ac.jp)
Received: from plewe.is.tsukuba.ac.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	i2OENWl5023333	for <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org>;
	Wed, 24 Mar 2004 23:23:32 +0900 (JST)
	(envelope-from till@plewe.is.tsukuba.ac.jp)
Received: (from till@localhost)
	by plewe.is.tsukuba.ac.jp (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i2OENWQF023332
	for freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org;
	Wed, 24 Mar 2004 23:23:32 +0900 (JST)	(envelope-from till)
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 23:23:32 +0900
From: Till Plewe <till@score.is.tsukuba.ac.jp>
To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org
Message-ID: <20040324142332.GA5549%till@score.is.tsukuba.ac.jp>
Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i-ja.1
Subject: port{up,down}grade
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
Reply-To: till@score.is.tsukuba.ac.jp
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 14:20:08 -0000


Can anybody shed some light on this?  Why does portupgrade think that
upgrading from icc-8.0.058 to icc-8.0.061 is downgrading?

# portupgrade icc
** No need to upgrade 'icc-8.0.058' (>= icc-8.0.058.p061). \
(specify -f to force)

# portupgrade -f icc
--->  Downgrading 'icc-8.0.058' to 'icc-8.0.058.p061' (lang/icc)