Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 25 Dec 2004 17:58:12 -0800
From:      Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
To:        Gerard Seibert <gerard-seibert@rcn.com>
Cc:        freebsd-questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: make.conf file & CPUTYPE?
Message-ID:  <20041226015811.GA98109@xor.obsecurity.org>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.WNT.4.61.0412252006250.3864@Treneq>
References:  <Pine.WNT.4.61.0412252006250.3864@Treneq>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--9jxsPFA5p3P2qPhR
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sat, Dec 25, 2004 at 08:17:00PM -0500, Gerard Seibert wrote:
> When I ran 'buildkernel' as well as 'buildworld', I used=20
> the 'CPUTYPE?=3Di686' directive in the 'make.conf' file. I was wondering =
if=20
> it is correct to leave it in the 'make.conf' file now that I am finished=
=20
> building a new kernel and updating the system. Would I be better off if I=
=20
> just removed it, or changed it to 'CPUTYPE=3Di686'. I assumed that the '?=
'=20
> was just for the 'buildworld' procedure.

Setting it with ?=3D was a bug that was recently fixed.  You can cvsup
and continue to set it with =3D.

Kris

--9jxsPFA5p3P2qPhR
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFBzhqzWry0BWjoQKURAs/aAKCvWI2Td8BZGZJsqpTBXdXoX5w+BgCfYqWK
pkhAbrAA1tHUbUYCxDQMRAE=
=gf9X
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--9jxsPFA5p3P2qPhR--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20041226015811.GA98109>