Date: Thu, 11 May 2000 13:13:42 +0100 From: Nik Clayton <nik@freebsd.org> To: Eric Ogren <eogren@earthlink.net> Cc: doc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Removing 2.X entries from FAQ? Message-ID: <20000511131342.A72612@catkin.nothing-going-on.org> In-Reply-To: <20000510203339.A7861@earthlink.net>; from eogren@earthlink.net on Wed, May 10, 2000 at 08:33:39PM -0400 References: <20000510203339.A7861@earthlink.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, May 10, 2000 at 08:33:39PM -0400, Eric Ogren wrote: > Anyways, to get to the point, what do people think about completely > removing all of the FreeBSD 2.X specific entries from the FAQ? I'm opposed to the idea of removing information from the FAQ when it's still accurate. I know of sites that are still running 2.x systems (when it works, why upgrade?). I can appreciate that people don't want to have to read through stuff that's not directly appropriate to them. There are proposals on the table to work through this in a more SGMLish way. Take a look through the doc mailing list archives for threads started by me that have the string "osversionmin" in them, to see one proposal on how to handle things, and prototype tools on how to implement it. N -- Internet connection, $19.95 a month. Computer, $799.95. Modem, $149.95. Telephone line, $24.95 a month. Software, free. USENET transmission, hundreds if not thousands of dollars. Thinking before posting, priceless. Somethings in life you can't buy. For everything else, there's MasterCard. -- Graham Reed, in the Scary Devil Monastery To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000511131342.A72612>