Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 15 Nov 2016 16:40:49 +1100 (EST)
From:      Ian Smith <smithi@nimnet.asn.au>
To:        wo0x <wo0x@c-base.org>
Cc:        freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: [Bug 214419] ipfw coredump when try to add rule with table of IPv6 addresses
Message-ID:  <20161115163121.D2342@sola.nimnet.asn.au>
In-Reply-To: <CAPTxRTfsmrZobxUBGzh_gHPLCdfyYr5N94dOJde6va4hWmmw9Q@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <CAPTxRTfsmrZobxUBGzh_gHPLCdfyYr5N94dOJde6va4hWmmw9Q@mail.gmail.com>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help
On Mon, 14 Nov 2016 13:43:15 +0000, wo0x wrote:
 > Hi there,
 > 
 >    I just subscribed to this list due to the subjected bug--and I am quite
 > happy to find this trouble has yet been noted by others:
 > 
 > # fwcmd=/sbin/ipfw
 > # ${fwcmd} -f table dnssrv flush
 > # ${fwcmd}    table dnssrv create type addr
 > # ${fwcmd}    table dnssrv add 2a02:e00:fffd:139::9
 > added: 2a02:e00:fffd:139::9/128 0
 > # ${fwcmd}    table dnssrv add 2001:41D0:A:0028::1
 > added: 2001:41d0:a:28::1/128 0
 > # ${fwcmd}    table dnssrv add 2001:4860:4860::8844
 > added: 2001:4860:4860::8844/128 0
 > # ${fwcmd} add 20020 allow ip6 from any to "table(dnssrv)" out via gif0
 > setup keep-state
 > Segmentation fault (core dumped)
 > # uname -v
 > FreeBSD 11.0-STABLE #0 r308635: Mon Nov 14 08:55:15 UTC 2016
 > root@tunnel.example.vnet:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/CUSTOM
 > 
 > When doing "ipfw list" all rules are with numbers lower to 20020 are listed
 > correctly. Then again SegFault is notified and processing of further rules
 > is interrupted, more precisely: The mandatory "65535 deny ip from any to
 > any" is also missing.

Since 'setup' only applies to TCP flows, I'm wondering if you may get a 
different result if you used 'allow tcp ...' instead of 'allow ip6 ...'?

cheers, Ian  (probably wildly guessing wrong ..)



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20161115163121.D2342>