Date: 21 Feb 2000 00:57:41 -0800 From: asami@FreeBSD.org (Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami) To: Will Andrews <andrews@technologist.com> Cc: FreeBSD Ports <ports@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: Qt/KDE upgrade path Message-ID: <vqcbt5bgcfu.fsf@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu> In-Reply-To: Will Andrews's message of "Mon, 21 Feb 2000 02:08:13 -0500" References: <20000220201511.L44834@shadow.blackdawn.com> <vqc66vj2gar.fsf@bubble.didi.com> <20000221020812.P44834@shadow.blackdawn.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* From: Will Andrews <andrews@technologist.com> * So for ports that won't build on -STABLE, patches get sent in as BROKEN * for them, or do we just leave them broken with no notification? Don't bother if it's just to mark them BROKEN. We can revisit them after the release. Satoshi To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?vqcbt5bgcfu.fsf>