From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 1 20:50:58 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67BD116A412; Sun, 1 Oct 2006 20:50:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from amdmi3@mail.ru) Received: from mx3.mail.ru (mx3.mail.ru [194.67.23.149]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEBB043D49; Sun, 1 Oct 2006 20:50:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from amdmi3@mail.ru) Received: from [213.148.29.33] (port=35040 helo=nexii.panopticon) by mx3.mail.ru with esmtp id 1GU8H2-0000vP-00; Mon, 02 Oct 2006 00:50:56 +0400 Received: from hades.panopticon (hades.panopticon [192.168.0.2]) by nexii.panopticon (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06E2517053; Mon, 2 Oct 2006 00:50:14 +0400 (MSD) Received: by hades.panopticon (Postfix, from userid 1000) id A4DD745EB; Mon, 2 Oct 2006 00:51:05 +0400 (MSD) Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2006 00:51:05 +0400 From: Dmitry Marakasov To: Ruslan Ermilov Message-ID: <20061001205105.GA69759@hades.panopticon> Mail-Followup-To: Ruslan Ermilov , cvs-src@FreeBSD.org References: <200609291934.k8TJYcXo038707@repoman.freebsd.org> <20060930144627.GA16298@hades.panopticon> <20060930153048.GC39704@rambler-co.ru> <20061001005802.GA47847@hades.panopticon> <20061001175617.GA25654@rambler-co.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20061001175617.GA25654@rambler-co.ru> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) Cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src ObsoleteFiles.inc X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 Oct 2006 20:50:58 -0000 * Ruslan Ermilov (ru@FreeBSD.org) wrote: > > > > Don't forget HEAD also > > > Care to prepare a patch for me? ;-) > > Let me try. The idea is to remove all instances of libpcap, libpthread > > and libc_r from /usr/lib, am I right? This should do the thing, if I've > > understood meaning of ObsoleteFiles.inc correctly. If this is right, > > similar changes should be committed into RELENG_6 as well. > No, this is not right. Only shared libraries were moved to /lib. > Archive and profiles libraries still live in /usr/lib. I've > committed the correct version to HEAD. About libc_r on HEAD, yes. > They all can be removed. Yes, that seem correct for me. The only thing that bugs me is .so symlinks. Shouldn't these be listed as well as OLD_FILES? -- Best regards, Dmitry mailto:amdmi3@mail.ru