From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 19 15:09:48 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85A8F1065670; Sun, 19 Feb 2012 15:09:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sahil@tandon.net) Received: from cricket.hamla.org (cricket.hamla.org [206.251.255.31]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A9838FC17; Sun, 19 Feb 2012 15:09:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from magic.hamla.org (cpe-68-174-92-20.nyc.res.rr.com [68.174.92.20]) by cricket.hamla.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6D5D98A054; Sun, 19 Feb 2012 10:09:47 -0500 (EST) Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2012 10:09:44 -0500 From: Sahil Tandon To: Alexey Dokuchaev Message-ID: <20120219150943.GA6673@magic.hamla.org> References: <201202182356.q1INuU7V061378@repoman.freebsd.org> <20120219060053.GA45762@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120219060053.GA45762@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.3 at cricket.hamla.org X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, Eitan Adler , cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/devel/adime Makefile ports/x11-wm/icewm Makefile ports/graphics/scr2png Makefile ports/x11/xbindkeys Makefile X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org List-Id: **OBSOLETE** CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2012 15:09:48 -0000 On Sun, 2012-02-19 at 06:00:53 +0000, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 11:56:30PM +0000, Eitan Adler wrote: > > eadler 2012-02-18 23:56:30 UTC > > > > Modified files: > > devel/adime Makefile > > x11-wm/icewm Makefile > > graphics/scr2png Makefile > > x11/xbindkeys Makefile > > Log: > > Remove gratitutous version number from LIB_DEPENDS where not required. > > How can it be verified if it's required or not? Even if you can prove it's > not now, what about the next releases? Instead of having to constantly keep > track and check if shlib version is "required", I would suggest simply > making it standard practice and always specify it. It also helps to find > ports that were forgotten to get updateD after shlib bumps in dependency. Alexey, I appreciate your perspective on this, but I want to make sure you are aware of the related discussion (and opposing viewpoints) on freebsd-ports: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2012-February/073267.html -- Sahil Tandon