Date: Mon, 10 May 1999 09:54:49 +0100 (BST) From: Doug Rabson <dfr@nlsystems.com> To: Peter Jeremy <peter.jeremy@auss2.alcatel.com.au> Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HEADS UP: config(8) changes.. Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.05.9905100954380.447-100000@herring.nlsystems.com> In-Reply-To: <99May10.120030est.40548@border.alcanet.com.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 10 May 1999, Peter Jeremy wrote: > Peter Wemm <peter@netplex.com.au> wrote: > >If you had old "vector xxxintr", it will now cause a syntax error rather than > >a warning. > > What is the new method of specifying a non-standard interrupt > function? I have some code (currently on 2.x, but I was hoping to be > able to move it) where I have different interrupt functions within the > same driver. I could use a single interrupt handler, but it would > mean either additional latency or overhead, which I'd like to avoid. Use the flags in the driver to select. -- Doug Rabson Mail: dfr@nlsystems.com Nonlinear Systems Ltd. Phone: +44 181 442 9037 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.05.9905100954380.447-100000>