Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2004 11:34:06 -0700 From: Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@xcllnt.net> To: Willem Jan Withagen <wjw@withagen.nl> Cc: Robert Watson <rwatson@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: One more ..... Message-ID: <20040716183406.GA7534@ns1.xcllnt.net> In-Reply-To: <0bec01c46b5a$98469e10$471b3dd4@digiware.nl> References: <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1040716121933.4361A-100000@fledge.watson.org> <0b8301c46b52$96931b50$471b3dd4@digiware.nl> <0bec01c46b5a$98469e10$471b3dd4@digiware.nl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Jul 16, 2004 at 07:30:31PM +0200, Willem Jan Withagen wrote: > > panic: process 82471(sh):2 holds Giant but isn't blocked on a lock > > cpuid = 1; > KDB: enter: panic > > Is there any purpose in reporting these crashes this way??? You might want to make sure your debugger backend is DDB and not GDB. -- Marcel Moolenaar USPA: A-39004 marcel@xcllnt.net
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040716183406.GA7534>