From owner-freebsd-mobile Wed Jan 26 13: 8:52 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E37D9151A6 for ; Wed, 26 Jan 2000 13:08:48 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (harmony.village.org [10.0.0.6]) by rover.village.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA01071; Wed, 26 Jan 2000 14:08:45 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.9.3/8.8.3) with ESMTP id OAA02084; Wed, 26 Jan 2000 14:08:22 -0700 (MST) Message-Id: <200001262108.OAA02084@harmony.village.org> To: Chris Webb Subject: Re: Will 3Com 3CCFE574BT work in 4.0 Release? Cc: Ken Seggerman , freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: Your message of "26 Jan 2000 12:00:23 GMT." <87wvoxniug.fsf@miranda.arachsys.com> References: <87wvoxniug.fsf@miranda.arachsys.com> <200001230347.UAA27217@harmony.village.org> Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2000 14:08:22 -0700 From: Warner Losh Sender: owner-freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org In message <87wvoxniug.fsf@miranda.arachsys.com> Chris Webb writes: : yesterday's -current snapshot on a as-yet unused Vaio N505X. I'm seeing Hmmm. NetBSD just committed some code that I thought would be unnecessary in FreeBSD. On resume they check to make sure that the pcic's interrupt register is set well. This is the interrupt for the pcic chip, not the interrupt for the cards. Looks like the pcic one survives, but the card one doesn't. Can you eject after suspend? Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-mobile" in the body of the message