Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 14:41:54 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block <wblock@wonkity.com> To: Gabor Kovesdan <gabor@FreeBSD.org> Cc: doc@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: RFC: Profiling and merging for the print edition Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1306201439100.62319@wonkity.com> In-Reply-To: <51C34A1E.8040004@FreeBSD.org> References: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1306171145490.79915@wonkity.com> <20130621.005500.1354772635358785822.hrs@allbsd.org> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1306201048030.62319@wonkity.com> <51C34A1E.8040004@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 20 Jun 2013, Gabor Kovesdan wrote: > Em 20-06-2013 19:03, Warren Block escreveu: >> >> There is a complication. Links to sections which have been eliminated by >> profiling will break, so those would also need profiling. I don't know how >> big an issue that will be, but suspect it will not be very much. > Two proposed solutions: > 1, The reference is often the last sentence of a paragraph, i.e. "For further > informations on foo, please refere to bar." This can be just put into a > profiled phrase. > 2, Or if the reference has a longer explanatory text, it can have its own > para with a profiling attribute. Right. My example showed the use of that. I just did not want to oversimplify. There is a little more work than just setting an edition on the sections to be removed for print. However, I think it is manageable.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.00.1306201439100.62319>