From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Nov 19 17:44:54 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from morpheus.skynet.be (morpheus.skynet.be [195.238.2.39]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8797837B479 for ; Sun, 19 Nov 2000 17:44:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.0.1.2] (dialup1024.brussels2.skynet.be [194.78.238.192]) by morpheus.skynet.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C751DB2B; Mon, 20 Nov 2000 02:44:41 +0100 (MET) Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Sender: blk@pop.skynet.be Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <20001119151418.K52433@echunga.lemis.com> References: <20001119151418.K52433@echunga.lemis.com> Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2000 02:44:39 +0100 To: Greg Lehey From: Brad Knowles Subject: Re: rawio 1.1 on FreeBSD 4.2-BETA? Cc: FreeBSD Stable Users Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG At 3:14 PM +1030 2000/11/19, Greg Lehey wrote: > There is a PR. I'm not sure under what circumstances it fails. This > is, in fact, a bug in the port, not in rawio: it's in files/patch-ac. > It should work fine if you delete this patch and then make clean and > rebuild. Ahh, okay. I'll give that a shot. Thanks! Just curious -- IIRC, rawio is specific to FreeBSD, so why does there need to be a FreeBSD port for it? -- These are my opinions -- not to be taken as official Skynet policy ====================================================================== Brad Knowles, || Belgacom Skynet SA/NV Systems Architect, Mail/News/FTP/Proxy Admin || Rue Colonel Bourg, 124 Phone/Fax: +32-2-706.13.11/12.49 || B-1140 Brussels http://www.skynet.be || Belgium "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." -Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message