From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Feb 24 7:48:11 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from trinity.skynet.be (trinity.skynet.be [195.238.2.38]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7A0437BD63 for ; Thu, 24 Feb 2000 07:48:07 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from blk@skynet.be) Received: from [195.238.1.121] (brad.techos.skynet.be [195.238.1.121]) by trinity.skynet.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 533E912301 for ; Thu, 24 Feb 2000 16:47:59 +0100 (MET) Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Sender: blk@pop.skynet.be Message-Id: In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2000 16:47:04 +0100 To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG From: Brad Knowles Subject: Re: Multiple Adaptec 2940U2W controllers? Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG At 4:04 PM +0100 2000/2/24, Brad Knowles wrote: > Now that the problem has been fixed, initial preliminary test > results indicate that I do actually see almost 2x speedup using > two host SCSI controllers to the two different drive array > controllers. I'm now moving one of the host SCSI adaptors back > to the other PCI bus, to see if that helps, hurts, or makes no > difference to the performance. > > If it doesn't hurt, I plan on leaving them on separate PCI busses. Blargh. It does appear to hurt. I'm trying the two 2940U2W controllers on the primary PCI bus with the on-board AIC-7890 controller hard-wired to the secondary PCI bus. If that doesn't work (and I don't suspect it will, but I want to test it for the sake of completeness), then for this machine the only solution appears to be to put SCSI controllers on the secondary PCI bus and everything else on the primary PCI bus. If that's the case, I'm going to be quite annoyed. That will mean that I cannot expand the number of SCSI busses in this machine by just adding more controllers. Instead, I will be forced to increase the number of SCSI channels by swapping out the current controllers and using 3950U2W controllers instead. Blargh. Double blargh. Blargh, say I. BTW, is anybody at all actually interested in this stuff, or am I just talking to myself? -- These are my opinions and should not be taken as official Skynet policy _________________________________________________________________________ |o| Brad Knowles, Belgacom Skynet NV/SA |o| |o| Systems Architect, Mail/News/FTP/Proxy Admin Rue Col. Bourg, 124 |o| |o| Phone/Fax: +32-2-706.13.11/726.93.11 B-1140 Brussels |o| |o| http://www.skynet.be Belgium |o| \/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/ Unix is like a wigwam -- no Gates, no Windows, and an Apache inside. Unix is very user-friendly. It's just picky who its friends are. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message