From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 19 20:10:44 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@www.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D02BC16A4CE for ; Fri, 19 Nov 2004 20:10:44 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pittgoth.com (14.zlnp1.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.149.111]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56C8643D1D for ; Fri, 19 Nov 2004 20:10:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from trhodes@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost (64-144-75-100.client.dsl.net [64.144.75.100]) (authenticated bits=0) by pittgoth.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id iAJKAdX2007853 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 19 Nov 2004 15:10:40 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from trhodes@FreeBSD.org) Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2004 15:10:34 -0500 From: Tom Rhodes To: Tillman Hodgson Message-ID: <20041119151034.4a6033fd@localhost> In-Reply-To: <20041119193745.GD61766@seekingfire.com> References: <419E4747.6070001@FreeBSD.org> <20041119193745.GD61766@seekingfire.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 0.9.12b (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.3) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-doc@www.freebsd.org Subject: Re: Proposal regarding security chapter X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2004 20:10:44 -0000 On Fri, 19 Nov 2004 13:37:45 -0600 Tillman Hodgson wrote: > On Fri, Nov 19, 2004 at 08:19:35PM +0100, Remko Lodder wrote: > > my thoughts: > > > > Split security into security and firewall > > update book.sgml to have firewall below security > > (and before mac) and update other references as well. > > > > I would like to hear your opinions about this :) > > "Firewall", by itself, doesn't feel like an intuitive place to split > topics to me (aside from the convenience of its size). However, I can > see a natural split between network security and host security. In that > scenario, MAC would become the largest portion of the host security > chapter. > > That still leaves security with 2 chapters, unfortunately. It only > addressed the page count balance between the two chapters. Breaking it into two chapters (network and local) would be nice; but then you have the problem of overlap (I think). -- Tom Rhodes