From owner-svn-ports-head@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Oct 21 14:19:33 2012
Return-Path: <owner-svn-ports-head@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2843CB31
 for <svn-ports-head@freebsd.org>; Sun, 21 Oct 2012 14:19:33 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from marcus@freebsd.org)
Received: from av-tac-rtp.cisco.com (av-tac-rtp.cisco.com [64.102.19.209])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0C288FC08
 for <svn-ports-head@freebsd.org>; Sun, 21 Oct 2012 14:19:32 +0000 (UTC)
X-TACSUNS: Virus Scanned
Received: from chook.cisco.com (localhost.cisco.com [127.0.0.1])
 by av-tac-rtp.cisco.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q9LEJWGv008485
 for <svn-ports-head@freebsd.org>; Sun, 21 Oct 2012 10:19:32 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from rtp-jclarke-89110.cisco.com (rtp-jclarke-89110.cisco.com
 [10.117.46.171])
 by chook.cisco.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q9LEJVXC017516;
 Sun, 21 Oct 2012 10:19:31 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <50840473.4040307@freebsd.org>
Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2012 10:19:31 -0400
From: Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@freebsd.org>
Organization: FreeBSD, Inc.
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8;
 rv:16.0) Gecko/20121010 Thunderbird/16.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Chris Rees <utisoft@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: svn commit: r306237 - in head/net/netatalk: . files
References: <201210211412.q9LECReM092093@svn.freebsd.org>
 <CADLo838nXVYXH2vRWUYpB7kJs+RKdjwmmKTGqzujhGHFwZr3Cg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CADLo838nXVYXH2vRWUYpB7kJs+RKdjwmmKTGqzujhGHFwZr3Cg@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org,
 ports-committers@freebsd.org
X-BeenThere: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree for head
 <svn-ports-head.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/svn-ports-head>,
 <mailto:svn-ports-head-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-ports-head>
List-Post: <mailto:svn-ports-head@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:svn-ports-head-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-ports-head>,
 <mailto:svn-ports-head-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2012 14:19:33 -0000

On 10/21/12 10:16 AM, Chris Rees wrote:
> 
> On 21 Oct 2012 15:12, "Joe Marcus Clarke" <marcus@freebsd.org
> <mailto:marcus@freebsd.org>> wrote:
>>
>> Author: marcus
>> Date: Sun Oct 21 14:12:26 2012
>> New Revision: 306237
>> URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/306237
>>
>> Log:
>>   Update to 2.2.4.  See
> http://netatalk.sourceforge.net/2.2/ReleaseNotes2.2.4.html
>>   for a list of changes in this release.
>>
>>   Feature safe: yes
>>
>> Deleted:
>>   head/net/netatalk/files/patch-etc_uams_Makefile.in
>> Modified:
>>   head/net/netatalk/Makefile
>>   head/net/netatalk/distinfo
>>
>> Modified: head/net/netatalk/Makefile
>>
> ==============================================================================
>> --- head/net/netatalk/Makefile  Sun Oct 21 14:01:14 2012        (r306236)
>> +++ head/net/netatalk/Makefile  Sun Oct 21 14:12:26 2012        (r306237)
>> @@ -6,8 +6,7 @@
>>  #
>>
>>  PORTNAME=      netatalk
>> -PORTVERSION=   2.2.3
>> -PORTREVISION=  2
>> +PORTVERSION=   2.2.4
>>  PORTEPOCH=     1
>>  CATEGORIES=    net print
>>  MASTER_SITES=  SF
>> @@ -31,7 +30,7 @@ CONFIGURE_ARGS+=      --with-tcp-wrappers \
>>                         --with-pkgconfdir=${PREFIX}/etc \
>>                         --with-libiconv=${LOCALBASE} \
>>                         --with-libgcrypt-dir=${LOCALBASE} \
>> -                      
> --with-uams-path=${LOCALBASE}/libexec/netatalk-uams \
>> +                       --with-uams-path=${PREFIX}/libexec/netatalk-uams \
> 
> Why this change?

Ah, thanks.  This changes fixes installation of UAMs in non-default
paths.  This bug had been in there for a long time, and I finally killed
it when I did the port of netatalk 3.0.  This was a "back-port".

Joe


-- 
Joe Marcus Clarke
FreeBSD GNOME Team	::	gnome@FreeBSD.org
FreeNode / #freebsd-gnome
http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome