Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2016 17:32:58 +0300 From: Slawa Olhovchenkov <slw@zxy.spb.ru> To: Alfred Perlstein <alfred@freebsd.org> Cc: Julian Elischer <julian@freebsd.org>, lev@FreeBSD.org, Glen Barber <gjb@FreeBSD.org>, Nathan Whitehorn <nwhitehorn@freebsd.org>, freebsd-current@freebsd.org, freebsd-pkgbase@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [CFT] packaging the base system with pkg(8) Message-ID: <20160419143258.GH4841@zxy.spb.ru> In-Reply-To: <57164068.8080800@freebsd.org> References: <20160302235429.GD75641@FreeBSD.org> <57152CE5.5050500@FreeBSD.org> <9D4B9C8B-41D7-42BC-B436-D23EFFF60261@ixsystems.com> <20160418191425.GW1554@FreeBSD.org> <571533B8.6090109@freebsd.org> <20160418194010.GX1554@FreeBSD.org> <57153E80.4080800@FreeBSD.org> <571551AB.4070203@freebsd.org> <5715E1E9.8060507@freebsd.org> <57164068.8080800@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 07:27:52AM -0700, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> Again, the point is that those objecting should put aside the time to
> implement what you (and I) are suggesting:
>
> > I could live with:
> >
> > base-utils 11.1
> > - ktrace uninstalled
> > - tcpdump uninstalled
> > + dd 11.1.1 (CVE-123412 fix)
> >
> >
> >
> > but not
> > {700 packages )
> > dd 11.1.1 dd with CVE fix
> > {29 more packages}
> > [tcpdump line is not present but you don't notice that]
> > {10 more packages}
> > [ktrace line would be here but you don't notice that either]
> > {15 more packages}
>
> What should not happen is that this incremental step forward be blocked
> by those unwilling to hash out the next steps.
Teoretical.
In practical this is happen with me.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20160419143258.GH4841>