Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 1 Sep 2004 01:35:48 +0200 (CEST)
From:      Lukas Ertl <le@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Craig Boston <craig@xfoil.gank.org>
Cc:        Daniel Eriksson <daniel_k_eriksson@telia.com>
Subject:   Re: PLEASE TEST: IPI deadlock avoidance patch
Message-ID:  <20040901013402.K557@korben.in.tern>
In-Reply-To: <20040831211944.GA65532@nowhere>
References:  <!~!UENERkVCMDkAAQACAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAABgAAAAAAAAA0VcX9IoJqUaXPS8MjT1PdsKAAAAQAAAAciVbQl3RwkOpqJOt+0jebAEAAAAA@telia.com> <!~!UENERkVCMDkAAQACAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAABgAAAAAAAAA0VcX9IoJqUaXPS8MjT1PdsKAAAAQAAAADquDJ+mdi0ClwuYGqAhj4gEAAAAA@telia.com> <20040831211944.GA65532@nowhere>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help
On Tue, 31 Aug 2004, Craig Boston wrote:

> So it seems that gvinum RAID-5 is a key factor in the corruption, and
> SMP greatly increases the odds of it happening...
>
> Is it worth creating a PR so this doesn't get lost amid the release
> madness?

PR isn't necessary, it's my number one task right now (which isn't easy, 
since the corruption isn't really repeatable at will).  Gimme a little more 
time.

thanks,
le

-- 
Lukas Ertl                         http://homepage.univie.ac.at/l.ertl/
le@FreeBSD.org                     http://people.freebsd.org/~le/



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040901013402.K557>