From owner-freebsd-hackers Thu May 2 14:28:45 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from rwcrmhc53.attbi.com (rwcrmhc53.attbi.com [204.127.198.39]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 562D237B400; Thu, 2 May 2002 14:28:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bmah.dyndns.org ([12.233.149.189]) by rwcrmhc53.attbi.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.27 201-229-121-127-20010626) with ESMTP id <20020502212833.SCQW5896.rwcrmhc53.attbi.com@bmah.dyndns.org>; Thu, 2 May 2002 21:28:33 +0000 Received: from intruder.bmah.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bmah.dyndns.org (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g42LSXcB072996; Thu, 2 May 2002 14:28:33 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bmah@intruder.bmah.org) Received: (from bmah@localhost) by intruder.bmah.org (8.12.3/8.12.3/Submit) id g42LSXjr072995; Thu, 2 May 2002 14:28:33 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200205022128.g42LSXjr072995@intruder.bmah.org> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.5+ 20020416 with nmh-1.0.4 To: Terry Lambert Cc: Dave Hayes , freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Difference between RELENG_* and RELENG_*_BP In-reply-to: <3CD1ACD6.5B2432DF@mindspring.com> References: <200205022047.g42Klxb84582@hokkshideh2.jetcafe.org> <3CD1ACD6.5B2432DF@mindspring.com> Comments: In-reply-to Terry Lambert message dated "Thu, 02 May 2002 14:17:10 -0700." From: "Bruce A. Mah" Reply-To: bmah@FreeBSD.ORG X-Face: g~c`.{#4q0"(V*b#g[i~rXgm*w;:nMfz%_RZLma)UgGN&=j`5vXoU^@n5v4:OO)c["!w)nD/!!~e4Sj7LiT'6*wZ83454H""lb{CC%T37O!!'S$S&D}sem7I[A 2V%N&+ X-Image-Url: http://www.employees.org/~bmah/Images/bmah-cisco-small.gif X-Url: http://www.employees.org/~bmah/ Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Thu, 02 May 2002 14:28:33 -0700 Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG If memory serves me right, Terry Lambert wrote: > Dave Hayes wrote: > > What does the _BP extension mean on the RELENG tags? > > Branch Point. > > It means the code has been branched, Yes. > either for a code slush, > or for other work that may not make it back in until it's > complete, which might take a while. Nope. The original poster asked about RELENG_* branches; they aren't used that way, which I'm sure you know. Anyone wanting more information about how we *really* use the RELENG_* branches should take a read through Murray Stokely's release engineering article: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/releng/index.html Bruce. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message