Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2005 14:32:37 +0400 From: Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@FreeBSD.org> To: Colin Percival <cperciva@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, obrien@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: CVSROOT exclude Message-ID: <20050910103237.GD53891@cell.sick.ru> In-Reply-To: <4322B308.90703@freebsd.org> References: <200509091936.j89JaUkA061400@repoman.freebsd.org> <4321E5DC.6020704@freebsd.org> <20050909195940.GA32217@dragon.NUXI.org> <4322B308.90703@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Sep 10, 2005 at 03:18:48AM -0700, Colin Percival wrote: C> > On Fri, Sep 09, 2005 at 12:43:24PM -0700, Colin Percival wrote: C> >>Speaking of which, would it be possible for someone who knows the right C> >>magical incantations to disable this check entirely for security branches? C> >>It's much easier for us if we don't add $FreeBSD$ tags, but repeatedly C> >>toggling the exclude file seems rather silly. C> > C> > This seems against the spirit of a security branch. One reason we have C> > the $FreeBSD$ tags so one can tell what source built a particular binary. C> C> I see your point, but the number of people who would rely upon being able C> to search for $FreeBSD$ tags is small -- and that approach won't work at C> all for people who downloaded the patches from ftp.freebsd.org instead of C> using CVSup. I don't agree that number of people who would use $FreeBSD$ tags is small. Concerning patched on FTP: why we don't supply patches that change RCS Id? -- Totus tuus, Glebius. GLEBIUS-RIPN GLEB-RIPE
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050910103237.GD53891>