Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 20:35:00 +0200 From: Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net> To: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Benjamin Adams <adams.benjamin@gmail.com> Subject: Re: IBM T60 dmsg 6.1-RC1 (problems will test patches) Message-ID: <20060419203500.1b6fe404@Magellan.Leidinger.net> In-Reply-To: <200604190728.52759.jhb@freebsd.org> References: <1145467346.32933.8.camel@BrutusBSD.rochester.rr.com> <200604190728.52759.jhb@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Am Wed, 19 Apr 2006 07:28:51 -0400 schrieb John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org>: > On Wednesday 19 April 2006 01:22 pm, Benjamin Adams wrote: > > I don't think the kernel is using dual core corrently. 6.0 and 7.0 did > > not reconize my acpi_bus for my hard drive. > > Also built in Wireless is not detected, Maybe other problems? > > Aside from the wireless it all looks (mostly) ok to me. > > > FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor System Detected: 2 CPUs > > cpu0 (BSP): APIC ID: 0 > > cpu1 (AP): APIC ID: 1 > > These are your two cores, though FreeBSD thinks they are HTT instead > of dual cores for some reason. You can toggle the > 'machdep.hyperthreading_allowed' sysctl to make the kernel schedule > threads onto the second core though. This is because Intel wants the Dual-Core to work with Windows XP. They (and AMD) decided to change the semantic of the HTT bits. A summary of a german article about this is at http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-all/2006-April/166131.html Feel free to ask for some specific details, I will translate those parts then. Bye, Alexander. -- Intel: where Quality is job number 0.9998782345! http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander @ Leidinger.net GPG fingerprint = C518 BC70 E67F 143F BE91 3365 79E2 9C60 B006 3FE7 WL http://www.amazon.de/exec/obidos/registry/1FZ4DTHQE9PQ8/ref=wl_em_to/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060419203500.1b6fe404>