Date: Sun, 06 Mar 2011 22:54:05 -0800 From: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> To: pav@FreeBSD.org Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/audio/rat Makefile distinfo pkg-descr pkg-plist ports/audio/rat30 Makefile distinfo pkg-descr ports/audio/speak_freely Makefile distinfo pkg-descr pkg-plist ports/audio/vat Makefile distinfo pkg-descr ports/audio/xspeakfree ... Message-ID: <4D74810D.3090604@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <1299451892.41675.39.camel@hood.oook.cz> References: <201103062210.p26MANtg038763@repoman.freebsd.org> <4D740EFA.9030908@FreeBSD.org> <1299451892.41675.39.camel@hood.oook.cz>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 03/06/2011 14:51, Pav Lucistnik wrote: > I'm not opposed to it. Thanks, done. :) > Just note that marking a port DEPRECATED does not > in any way alert existing users about it's forthcoming removal. I know it's not a universal solution, but portmaster at least does bark if it encounters a port that is DEPRECATED, IGNORE, MOVED, etc. Doug -- Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much. -- OK Go Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS. Yours for the right price. :) http://SupersetSolutions.com/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4D74810D.3090604>