Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2013 19:43:48 -0600 From: Mark Felder <feld@FreeBSD.org> To: Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org> Cc: FreeBSD Stable Mailing List <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: BIND chroot environment in 10-RELEASE...gone? Message-ID: <033E68C4-D6E4-4207-94EF-E130E7C0B112@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20131204004358.988FDB13BAB@rock.dv.isc.org> References: <529D9CC5.8060709@rancid.berkeley.edu> <529DF7FA.7050207@passap.ru> <529E179D.7030701@rancid.berkeley.edu> <1386093454.2626.55043181.26E90FA5@webmail.messagingengine.com> <20131204004358.988FDB13BAB@rock.dv.isc.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--Apple-Mail=_E4A2D37D-B417-41E6-A7E2-71F4D1C77F06 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 On Dec 3, 2013, at 18:43, Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org> wrote: >=20 > In message = <1386093454.2626.55043181.26E90FA5@webmail.messagingengine.com>, Mark = Felder writes: >> On Tue, Dec 3, 2013, at 11:40, Michael Sinatra wrote: >>>=20 >>> I am going to put as many of the bits together as I can to see if I = can >>> recreate the chroot environment via a port on 10.0-RELEASE. I'll = also >>> submit a PR. But I agree with the others that this is not a good = idea, >>> and if I had known that the port would remove support for chroot, I >>> would have vigorously protested the switch to unbound. >>>=20 >>=20 >> There was no alternative; we couldn't keep BIND in base. BIND 9 will >> certainly have a EoL before the EoL of FreeBSD 10.x, and we can't use >> BIND 10 because it requires importing Python to base. >=20 > We, ISC, don't know when BIND 9 will stop being supported so I fail > to see how FreeBSD can *know* this. We have committed to 9.9.x > being supported through June 2017. I suspect the last 9.X will > also be supported at least that long as well. Sorry, this wasn=92t completely clear to me. I was under the impression = that someone in the project had knowledge that 9.x was on a short leash = and that was a part of the decision making process. Maybe an upgrade to = the latest 9.x release would have been less painful; I don=92t know. = Thanks for the information. --Apple-Mail=_E4A2D37D-B417-41E6-A7E2-71F4D1C77F06 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJSnojUAAoJEJg7ZFAfE+JS/iMH/0JinL8YMLjMfVcQKGm4ekSr nCJ3DiG6fGzqxMIj7FAYG2MrhuIrWSMPkUm3iQRAdY6X+yXNp7m3UQzV69+JNh4h Gt5DN3yHhPl5PlnU+lZHyu6e4v35qJHHnWCsPUzscDY5ebbtAIzrAfD0R0wnZcnI mIeHYeb8pLU+LOFLyjrE3qmZ6s5vo4YLXJLHbZgxuHT+FA9za5c96393W/6swMia /BGCZVmZuwrP8ZFXPRL8Am4LbuhFmefBtFj4qjgns3+mwxIZlJYA9GEFM0qeA2Xy b98ay3E7H/7vxxwPrHpqKZOMUIvsvn9WFQZRl3g1l1l8mi0KUYE4BZUpoVaSrK0= =6dqU -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail=_E4A2D37D-B417-41E6-A7E2-71F4D1C77F06--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?033E68C4-D6E4-4207-94EF-E130E7C0B112>