Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2010 12:03:28 -0800 From: "Li, Qing" <qing.li@bluecoat.com> To: "David Horn" <dhorn2000@gmail.com>, <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-net <freebsd-net@freebsd.org> Subject: RE: netinet6/in6.c r201282 Message-ID: <B583FBF374231F4A89607B4D08578A43063E9430@bcs-mail03.internal.cacheflow.com> In-Reply-To: <25ff90d61001041651gf4509ads4d023320471ab74d@mail.gmail.com> References: <25ff90d61001022118y3c2a4ddcr30fd5283af065346@mail.gmail.com> <25ff90d61001041651gf4509ads4d023320471ab74d@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Sorry, I didn't even see your original email until today. Please send problem reports directly to qingli@freebsd.org instead of my work email to get faster response. Thanks, -- Qing >=20 > On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 12:18 AM, David Horn <dhorn2000@gmail.com> wrote: > > Qing -- > > > > I have been having some issues with local ipv6 routes to machines > that > > are supposed to be on-link (attached to the same ethernet switch as > my > > test FreeBSD 9.0 box, and in the same /64) not being able to be > > accessed properly after r201282. > > >=20 > Qing -- >=20 > Thanks for the fix. r201543 seems to work well for me so far. >=20 > --Dave Horn
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?B583FBF374231F4A89607B4D08578A43063E9430>