From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 14 14:44:53 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF90F16A4CE for ; Mon, 14 Mar 2005 14:44:53 +0000 (GMT) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (f170.freebsd.dk [212.242.86.170]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 216EC43D2D for ; Mon, 14 Mar 2005 14:44:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by critter.freebsd.dk (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j2EEipHf001779 for ; Mon, 14 Mar 2005 15:44:52 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) To: current@freebsd.org From: Poul-Henning Kamp Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2005 15:44:51 +0100 Message-ID: <1778.1110811491@critter.freebsd.dk> Sender: phk@critter.freebsd.dk Subject: NTFS maintainer/hacker sought ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2005 14:44:54 -0000 Anyone working on NTFS ? I'm not sure what the correct way of implementing vfs_hash() instead of the home-rolled version in NTFS. Is anybody actively working on this code ? If so, please get in touch with me. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.