Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2014 17:40:18 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 193055] [stage] dns/posadis: add stage support and claim maintainership Message-ID: <bug-193055-13-25L2khBprg@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-193055-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-193055-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193055 --- Comment #6 from C Hutchinson <portmaster@bsdforge.com> --- (In reply to John Marino from comment #5) > (In reply to C Hutchinson from comment #2) > > Well. the "grim reaper" indicates that anything w/o > > STAGING, gets the axe, on the 31st. Unless there's a pr(1). > > > Well, a PR with a fix, not an I.O.U. > > > > While I realize this port is rather old. It appeared to > > still have some value left in it. Runs wonderfully on > > anything with a proper compiler (GCC). But hasn't been > > "clangified". The adjustments I've already made. Get it > > past the STAGE requirement. So the DEPRECATED bit can now > > be removed. Technically a new pr(1) should be opened after > > that, against the MAINTAINER. Letting them know it doesn't > > build with clang. > > > Are you saying it doesn't build on the current Release of FreeBSD? It needs > to. At the very least define "USE_GCC=yes" > > > What about poudriere logs? > I don't trust redports anymore after the last couple of PRs. Sure. I get it. make -j100 seems dangerous. No? I'll attempt this locally, and provide the output. --Chris -- vote John Marino, for Commit Bit Of The Year -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-193055-13-25L2khBprg>