From owner-freebsd-security  Tue Dec  2 14:05:33 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-security>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id OAA08753
          for security-outgoing; Tue, 2 Dec 1997 14:05:33 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-security)
Received: from brahma.sics.se (brahma.sics.se [193.10.66.43])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id OAA08746
          for <freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG>; Tue, 2 Dec 1997 14:05:29 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from assar@sics.se)
Received: from anhur.sics.se (anhur.sics.se [193.10.66.46]) by brahma.sics.se (8.8.7/) via ESMTP id XAA16661; Tue, 2 Dec 1997 23:04:59 +0100 (MET)
	env-from (assar@sics.se)
Received: from assaris.sics.se by anhur.sics.se (8.7.3/SICS-client)
	with ESMTP id XAA18013; Tue, 2 Dec 1997 23:04:58 +0100 (MET)
Received: (from assar@localhost)
	by assaris.sics.se (8.8.5/8.8.5) id XAA11268;
	Tue, 2 Dec 1997 23:05:48 +0100 (MET)
To: dima@best.net
Cc: mohacsi@fsz.bme.hu (Janos Mohacsi), freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: Kerberos 5 or Kerberos IV or DCE?
References: <199712022052.MAA13417@burka.rdy.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.68)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
From: Assar Westerlund <assar@sics.se>
Date: 02 Dec 1997 23:05:47 +0100
In-Reply-To: dima@best.net's message of "Tue, 2 Dec 1997 12:52:48 -0800 (PST)"
Message-ID: <5liut7pfic.fsf@assaris.sics.se>
Lines: 10
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.5/Emacs 19.34
Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

dima@best.net (Dima Ruban) writes:
> > Heimdal? I there a working version of DCE for FreeBSD? 
> 
> Last time I've checked Heimdal - it had too many problems and was _not_
> compatible with krb5 from MIT. It was about 2 month ago.

There has been progress.  It's not perfect, but it does work under
FreeBSD (my laptop runs FreeBSD, so...).

/assar