Date: Wed, 07 Feb 2018 10:25:34 -0600 From: Mark Felder <feld@FreeBSD.org> To: Jan Beich <jbeich@FreeBSD.org> Cc: ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r461119 - head/www/palemoon Message-ID: <1518020734.63233.1262859096.5BD73186@webmail.messagingengine.com> In-Reply-To: <bmh1-oc31-wny@FreeBSD.org> References: <201802062357.w16NvV0o090528@repo.freebsd.org> <bmh1-oc31-wny@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Feb 6, 2018, at 18:52, Jan Beich wrote: > Mark Felder <feld@FreeBSD.org> writes: > > > +# Needs branding removed for legal reasons. > > +# Removing from our mirrors until this is handled. > > +# See PR 225717 > > +LICENSE_PERMS= no-pkg-mirror no-pkg-sell > > Did you mean NO_PACKAGE? The port doesn't define LICENSE, so > LICENSE_PERMS is unlikely to be honored. > I thought this worked even without a license explicitly honored. Is that not the case? Bummer... Handbook says it is equivalent to setting NO_PACKAGE and I like the LICENSE_PERMS granularity better anyway. https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/porters-handbook/licenses.html -- Mark Felder ports-secteam & portmgr member feld@FreeBSD.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1518020734.63233.1262859096.5BD73186>