From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 16 16:13:55 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA5C216A41F for ; Fri, 16 Sep 2005 16:13:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from vdemart1@tin.it) Received: from vsmtp4.tin.it (vsmtp4.tin.it [212.216.176.224]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6654343D48 for ; Fri, 16 Sep 2005 16:13:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from vdemart1@tin.it) Received: from pswm4.cp.tin.it (212.216.176.70) by vsmtp4.tin.it (7.2.060.1) id 4328035200174B1E for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 16 Sep 2005 18:13:47 +0200 Message-ID: <3360624.1126887229256.JavaMail.root@pswm4.cp.tin.it> Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2005 17:13:49 +0100 (GMT+01:00) From: Vittorio To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: 193.108.204.20 Subject: Re: Re: Updating freebsd without cvsup X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Vittorio List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2005 16:13:55 -0000 Thanks. I've just compiled the portsnap sources and put the following in /usr/local/etc/portsnap.conf: # Defaults: WORKDIR=/usr/local/portsnap PORTSDIR=/usr/ports KEYPRINT=9b5feee6d69f170e3dd0a2c8e469ddbd64f13f978f2f3aede40c98633216c330 URL=http://portsnap.daemonology.net BUT # portsnap fetch Fetching public key... failed. What's wrong with the original key in the portsnap.conf.sample file? Thanks again Vittorio >----Messaggio originale---- >Da: work@ashleymoran.me.uk >Data: 16-set-2005 5.14 PM >A: "Vittorio" >Cc: >Ogg: Re: Updating freebsd without cvsup > >Vittorio wrote: >> Is there another >> alternative way of defining the proxy OR any other way of getting a new >> source three to be copied to the server, e.g., by means of a cd burnt >> at home? >> > > >Have you considered using the sysutils/portsnap port? It's what I use >to keep my servers up-to- date. It works over HTTP so it might be easier >to work around your proxy. > >http://www.daemonology.net/portsnap/ > >Ashley >