From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 24 06:37:25 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AB8416A4CE for ; Wed, 24 Mar 2004 06:37:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from plewe.is.tsukuba.ac.jp (plewe.is.tsukuba.ac.jp [130.158.81.199]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FA4043D39 for ; Wed, 24 Mar 2004 06:37:24 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from till@plewe.is.tsukuba.ac.jp) Received: from plewe.is.tsukuba.ac.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1]) i2OEeoRp071720 for ; Wed, 24 Mar 2004 23:40:50 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from till@plewe.is.tsukuba.ac.jp) Received: (from till@localhost) by plewe.is.tsukuba.ac.jp (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i2OEeo70071719 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 24 Mar 2004 23:40:50 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from till) Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 23:40:50 +0900 From: Till Plewe To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040324144050.GB5549%till@score.is.tsukuba.ac.jp> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20040324142332.GA5549%till@score.is.tsukuba.ac.jp> <40619A11.9030902@elvandar.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <40619A11.9030902@elvandar.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i-ja.1 Subject: Re: port{up,down}grade X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: till@score.is.tsukuba.ac.jp List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 14:37:25 -0000 On Wed, Mar 24, 2004 at 03:24:17PM +0100, Remko Lodder wrote: > Hi Till > > Till Plewe wrote: > > >Can anybody shed some light on this? Why does portupgrade think that > >upgrading from icc-8.0.058 to icc-8.0.061 is downgrading? > > > Constructive fault, see below > > ># portupgrade icc > >** No need to upgrade 'icc-8.0.058' (>= icc-8.0.058.p061). \ > >(specify -f to force) > > -p061 means patchlevel 061.. not version 8.0.061 but 8.0.058-p061 , it > could easily be that your current version was actualy newer... > Thanks Remko. That would explain why portupgrade thinks its downgrading. The funny thing is that "portupgrade icc" before produced the message: Go to Intel Premier Support ... obtain l_cc_pc_8.0.058.tar.gz l_cc_pc_8.0.058_pe061.tar.gz ... Put l_cc_pc_8.0.058.tar.gz l_cc_pc_8.0.058_pe061.tar.gz into /usr/ports/distfiles and run make again" ... when icc-8.0.058 was installed. - Till