Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 02 Jan 2005 10:32:57 -0500
From:      Micah Bushouse <bushous2@msu.edu>
To:        Bill Moran <wmoran@potentialtech.com>
Cc:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: FreeBSD Gateway
Message-ID:  <1104679977.274.25.camel@localhost>
In-Reply-To: <20050102093214.10d4b2e1.wmoran@potentialtech.com>
References:  <000001c4f09b$f67534d0$68bbbbc0@kewdaeahnhd04i> <20050102093214.10d4b2e1.wmoran@potentialtech.com>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help
> > "Victor Foulk" <VFoulk@KEWD.com> wrote:
> [...]
> "Bill Moran" <wmoran@potentialtech.com> wrote:
[...]
> However, in my experience, the most critical hardware choice is
> the network cards themselves.  Cheapo network cards will really
> hurt performance under load.  So toss the cheapo Realtek cards
> into the trash and spend a little extra on an Intel or other name
> brand card designed for a server.
[...]

Similarly to Mr. Foulk, I'm also in the market for a pair of NICs for a
small organization's firewall/gateway (in this case using IPFilter). 

Per your plug for Intel, I'm browsing 3Com and Intel NICs right now on
mwave.com. 

Intel 10/100 w 3DES - $63
http://www.mwave.com/mwave/viewspec.hmx?scriteria=1562535
3Com 10/100 w 3DES - $92
http://www.mwave.com/mwave/viewspec.hmx?scriteria=3387169

Why do you suppose that while the 3Com seems very similar to the Intel
it costs $30 more? Perhaps because it specs more types of encryption
than the Intel NIC?

How would this hardware acceleration integrate w FreeBSD? Per some Linux
binary compat (as both cards are compat w Linux kernel 2.2+)?

Will the hardware encryption on these cards ever be useful in a
firewall/gateway application?

Sorry for all the questions and thanks for your time,

-- 
Micah Bushouse <bushous2@msu.edu>



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1104679977.274.25.camel>