From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Dec 13 09:35:42 2010
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 066C0106564A
	for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Mon, 13 Dec 2010 09:35:42 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from alexander@leidinger.net)
Received: from mail.ebusiness-leidinger.de (mail.ebusiness-leidinger.de
	[217.11.53.44]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B33F88FC08
	for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Mon, 13 Dec 2010 09:35:41 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from outgoing.leidinger.net (p57B3B43C.dip.t-dialin.net
	[87.179.180.60])
	by mail.ebusiness-leidinger.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BB16E84400D;
	Mon, 13 Dec 2010 10:35:38 +0100 (CET)
Received: from unknown (IO.Leidinger.net [192.168.2.110])
	by outgoing.leidinger.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B68D31D5C;
	Mon, 13 Dec 2010 10:35:35 +0100 (CET)
Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 10:35:35 +0100
From: Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net>
To: Artem Belevich <fbsdlist@src.cx>
Message-ID: <20101213103535.00005f3d@unknown>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=ehLNs8aeYfGUattetm7oMj8HhEB1Vnep9uAZk@mail.gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTi=z1_KWKmhqFjNYHZfgAyPgsUVvgJ0P29KOPpnZ@mail.gmail.com>
	<20101211215341.0000097c@unknown>
	<AANLkTi=ehLNs8aeYfGUattetm7oMj8HhEB1Vnep9uAZk@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.6 (GTK+ 2.16.0; i586-pc-mingw32msvc)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-EBL-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information
X-EBL-MailScanner-ID: BB16E84400D.A423F
X-EBL-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-EBL-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, spamhaus-ZEN,
	SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-1, required 6, autolearn=disabled,
	ALL_TRUSTED -1.00)
X-EBL-MailScanner-From: alexander@leidinger.net
X-EBL-MailScanner-Watermark: 1292837739.22739@9x+KH+CexuL6Q45tcOC/eA
X-EBL-Spam-Status: No
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 12:11:05 +0000
Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: syscall provider naming convention. Re: kern/152822: [patch]
 DTrace: syscall provider for compat/freebsd32
X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD
	<freebsd-hackers.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>,
	<mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 09:35:42 -0000

On Sat, 11 Dec 2010 23:38:32 -0800 Artem Belevich <fbsdlist@src.cx>
wrote:

> Functionally both approaches are about the same functionally. Each has
> pluses and minuses. Using module, though, looks somewhat cleaner.

I agree.

Bye,
Alexander.