From owner-freebsd-security Mon Nov 29 7:55:39 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from flood.ping.uio.no (flood.ping.uio.no [129.240.78.31]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EBBB15463; Mon, 29 Nov 1999 07:55:32 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from des@flood.ping.uio.no) Received: (from des@localhost) by flood.ping.uio.no (8.9.3/8.9.3) id QAA95608; Mon, 29 Nov 1999 16:55:10 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from des) To: Mauricio Westendorff Pegoraro Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Question about lo0 References: <14400.17989.189233.907961@anarcat.dyndns.org> <38405B15.64786825@pucrs.br> From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Date: 29 Nov 1999 16:55:09 +0100 In-Reply-To: Mauricio Westendorff Pegoraro's message of "Sat, 27 Nov 1999 20:28:38 -0200" Message-ID: Lines: 13 User-Agent: Gnus/5.070097 (Pterodactyl Gnus v0.97) Emacs/20.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org [moved from -security to -questions] Mauricio Westendorff Pegoraro writes: > My question is: why the lo0 interface wasn't configured when the system started? > It was a problem (bug) when freebsd tryied to configure lo0? Or, by default, > freebsd doesn't 'autoconfigure' lo0? 1) this doesn't belong on -security. 2) read the errata list for 3.3-RELEASE. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@flood.ping.uio.no To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message