Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2005 12:44:27 +0400 From: Vsevolod Stakhov <vsevolod@highsecure.ru> To: Ade Lovett <ade@FreeBSD.org> Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org, Ben Gross <ben@bengross.com> Subject: Re: spamprobe and Berkeley DB Message-ID: <42D4D46B.7080100@highsecure.ru> In-Reply-To: <42CF4853.701@FreeBSD.org> References: <CA7815AA-0B7C-4DE9-AE08-D1E2E14E08F1@bengross.com> <42CF4853.701@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Ade Lovett wrote: > Ben Gross wrote: > >>First, thanks for keep the port up to date. Overall, the spamprobe port >>works well. The only issue for me is it has an old berkeley DB port, >>db4 hard coded which is less reliable than the newer Berkeley DB ports. >>If the Berkeley DB selection code could be ripped from another port >>such as www/apache2, security/cyrus-sasl2 or mail/ postfix and put in >>the spamprobe port it would make it much easier to use db42 or even db43. > > > A more logical approach would be to develop appropriate code for > USE_BDB/USE_BDB_VER/WANT_BDB = (3,4,41,42, maybe even 185 for base > system), and implement that in bsd.port.mk, in a similar manner to the > MYSQL and PGSQL knobs. I've already make this (so called bsd.bdb.mk). Should I send PR about it? > It could even warrant a separate bsd.database.mk file where such things Yes, but who is now working on this?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?42D4D46B.7080100>