From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 6 18:20:14 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14E38106564A for ; Mon, 6 Aug 2012 18:20:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: from oproxy11-pub.bluehost.com (unknown [IPv6:2605:dc00:100:2::a3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BE6538FC12 for ; Mon, 6 Aug 2012 18:20:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 13998 invoked by uid 0); 4 Aug 2012 16:05:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO box543.bluehost.com) (74.220.219.143) by oproxy11.bluehost.com with SMTP; 4 Aug 2012 16:05:54 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=apotheon.com; s=default; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:To:From:Date; bh=8bWH48U5KHGGjgnFhkxzDXfEdpGC6DbpDJRapXg8P/Q=; b=al3fp7lkJR5KVNGmGP1fKqtxxcjBmh7Hg6VFsJ4GGu6kuDhPKYtZr+OH4pmqtMhWj9iN0+c4yslzRzjDDNFMe2LeKWOgKVwABUSo53mCZfVCsz2hXBcTm6baZir/lCUo; Received: from [24.8.180.234] (port=63436 helo=localhost) by box543.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1SxgrR-0004Lw-RL for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 04 Aug 2012 10:05:53 -0600 Date: Sat, 4 Aug 2012 10:05:53 -0600 From: Chad Perrin To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20120804160553.GA32048@hemlock.hydra> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20120802185759.GB12255@hemlock.hydra> <20120803081433.0ad12c03@AMD620.ovitrap.com> <20120803222125.GE26239@hemlock.hydra> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Identified-User: {2737:box543.bluehost.com:apotheon:apotheon.com} {sentby:smtp auth 24.8.180.234 authed with perrin@apotheon.com} Subject: Re: Patent hit - MS goes after Linux - FreeBSD ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2012 18:20:14 -0000 On Sat, Aug 04, 2012 at 07:57:34AM +0200, Wojciech Puchar wrote: > >Do lawyers not use the law to their clients' advatage -- often abusing it > >-- just because they're wrong in the final analysis? > seems you never worked long with lawyers, or you are lucky and have > really fair one. If the word "fair" can be used for lawyers at all. > > Most often they just want court cases to have "work". I'm not sure you understood what I said, because what *you* said here seems irrelevant to what I said. -- Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ]