From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 12 13:19:20 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 895BC16A4CE for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2004 13:19:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from moek.pir.net (moek.pir.net [130.64.1.215]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 723C843D1F for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2004 13:19:20 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from pir@pir.net) Received: from pir by moek.pir.net with local (Exim) id 1ArOEx-0001Wy-00 for stable@freebsd.org; Thu, 12 Feb 2004 16:19:19 -0500 Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2004 16:19:19 -0500 From: Peter Radcliffe To: stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040212211919.GB4774@pir.net> Mail-Followup-To: stable@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2i X-fish: < X-Copy-On-Listmail: Please do NOT Cc: me on list mail. Subject: MFC of bluetooth stack ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: stable@freebsd.org List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2004 21:19:20 -0000 Is there any likelyhood of the bluetooth stack being MFCed ? I'm assuming not, since 5.x is due to become -stable fairly soon... P. -- pir