Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 27 Nov 2018 23:53:22 +0700
From:      Victor Sudakov <vas@mpeks.tomsk.su>
To:        "John R. Levine" <johnl@iecc.com>
Cc:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Invalid DKIM signatures in this list
Message-ID:  <20181127165322.GA87173@admin.sibptus.ru>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.OSX.2.21.1811271140310.75390@ary.qy>
References:  <20181126125259.GB86999@admin.sibptus.ru> <20181126172133.CDCDB2008E6098@ary.qy> <20181127015856.GA79319@admin.sibptus.ru> <alpine.OSX.2.21.1811262122261.73238@ary.qy> <20181127160330.GC78157@admin.sibptus.ru> <alpine.OSX.2.21.1811271140310.75390@ary.qy>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help
John R. Levine wrote:
>On Tue, 27 Nov 2018, Victor Sudakov wrote:
>> With all due respect to you as the co-author of the RFC, it does say
>> something about deleting old signatures.  I'm not quoting for you (this would
>> be odd) but for the general public here who are reading this thread.
>
>I know it does.  Murray was guessing, and he guessed wrong.

Which is proved where? Is RFC6377 obsolete now?

>"BCP" at the IETF doesn't mean what it sounds like.

Then, what is the BCP now, regarding DKIM and mailing lists?

-- 
Victor Sudakov,  VAS4-RIPE, VAS47-RIPN
2:5005/49@fidonet http://vas.tomsk.ru/



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20181127165322.GA87173>