Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2018 23:53:22 +0700 From: Victor Sudakov <vas@mpeks.tomsk.su> To: "John R. Levine" <johnl@iecc.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Invalid DKIM signatures in this list Message-ID: <20181127165322.GA87173@admin.sibptus.ru> In-Reply-To: <alpine.OSX.2.21.1811271140310.75390@ary.qy> References: <20181126125259.GB86999@admin.sibptus.ru> <20181126172133.CDCDB2008E6098@ary.qy> <20181127015856.GA79319@admin.sibptus.ru> <alpine.OSX.2.21.1811262122261.73238@ary.qy> <20181127160330.GC78157@admin.sibptus.ru> <alpine.OSX.2.21.1811271140310.75390@ary.qy>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
John R. Levine wrote: >On Tue, 27 Nov 2018, Victor Sudakov wrote: >> With all due respect to you as the co-author of the RFC, it does say >> something about deleting old signatures. I'm not quoting for you (this would >> be odd) but for the general public here who are reading this thread. > >I know it does. Murray was guessing, and he guessed wrong. Which is proved where? Is RFC6377 obsolete now? >"BCP" at the IETF doesn't mean what it sounds like. Then, what is the BCP now, regarding DKIM and mailing lists? -- Victor Sudakov, VAS4-RIPE, VAS47-RIPN 2:5005/49@fidonet http://vas.tomsk.ru/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20181127165322.GA87173>