Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 29 May 2003 23:58:59 -0500
From:      "Kevin Kinsey, DaleCo, S.P." <kdk@daleco.biz>
To:        "Bill Moran" <wmoran@potentialtech.com>, "Stephen McKay" <smckay@internode.on.net>
Cc:        chat@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: grammar (was Re: Fwd: ESR/OSI's Unix/Linux-history-ladentreatise on SCO vs. IBM)
Message-ID:  <00ae01c32668$2ff5ad70$2441d5cc@nitanjared>
References:  <p05200f42baf03c5204ce@[192.168.254.205]><20030520203225.GA30587@thyrsus.com> <xxbrxxw0b0.rxx@localhost.localdomain><Pine.LNX.4.53.0305202116560.9778@monet.psys.org><200305221613.h4MGDNLR016491@dungeon.home> <3ECD3A8C.1040506@potentialtech.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
From: "Bill Moran" <wmoran@potentialtech.com>
To: "Stephen McKay" <smckay@internode.on.net>
Cc: <chat@freebsd.org>
Sent: Thursday, May 22, 2003 4:01 PM
Subject: Re: grammar (was Re: Fwd: ESR/OSI's
Unix/Linux-history-ladentreatise on SCO vs. IBM)


> Stephen McKay wrote:
> > On Wednesday, 21st May 2003, brian@planetshwoop.com wrote:
> >
> >>On Tue, 20 May 2003, Gary W. Swearingen wrote:
> >>
> >>>What's worse is that y'all apply the same old propaganda about
gifts to
> >>                      ^^^^^
> >>
> >>You commend his grammar and then stick that whammie in there?
> >>
> >>You, not "y'all".  Please.
> >
> > No!  No!  It is merely artistic flair!
> >
> > Once he's established his impeccable grasp of grammar he is
permitted to
> > bend it in order to demonstrate his grasp of the vernacular,
hence showing
> > he not only knows the Official Grammar, but also a Dialect.  It's
a solid
> > points scorer.
> >
> > This isn't the same as the 99% of Internet users who believe a
valid
> > contraction of "you are" is "your", or the other new percent who
know
> > about "you're", but believe it is a possessive pronoun.
> >
> > Salt with :-) as necessary, and enjoy your language!
>
> Are you talking about the people who don't know the difference
between
> "then" and "than" and think that "sux" is spelled properly?
>
The spelling of this word as "sux" is permissible as a
visual rhyme during religious flame wars, e.g. "Tux sux!"

Kevin Kinsey
grammar-nazi-in-training




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?00ae01c32668$2ff5ad70$2441d5cc>