From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 16 19:38:02 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3135116A4CE for ; Thu, 16 Dec 2004 19:38:02 +0000 (GMT) Received: from szerver.siodigit.hu (ns.siodigit.hu [194.143.225.126]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85B8643D1F for ; Thu, 16 Dec 2004 19:38:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from feczo@siodigit.hu) Received: from feczo.sdi.hu ([192.168.0.217]) by szerver.siodigit.hu with esmtp (Exim 4.43 (FreeBSD)) id 1Cf1Rj-000EEG-Lc for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 16 Dec 2004 20:37:58 +0100 From: Feczak Szabolcs To: FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain Organization: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Si=F3digit?= Kft. Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2004 20:35:09 +0100 Message-Id: <1103225709.8832.4.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.1.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: -5.9 (-----) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "szerver.siodigit.hu", hasmessagelabel similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: ad0: 190781MB [387618/16/63] at ata0-master UDMA100 ad1: 190782MB [387621/16/63] at ata1-master UDMA100 What can be the problem ? The drives should have the same parameters ... [...] Content analysis details: (-5.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description -------------------------------------------------- -3.3 ALL_TRUSTED Did not pass through any untrusted hosts 1% [score: 0.0000]white-list Subject: Identical physical drives reported different to have different size by dmesg X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2004 19:38:02 -0000 ad0: 190781MB [387618/16/63] at ata0-master UDMA100 ad1: 190782MB [387621/16/63] at ata1-master UDMA100 What can be the problem ? The drives should have the same parameters ... I have tried to override Cylinder numbers with fdisk -i without luck ...