Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2013 18:51:23 GMT From: Anton Shterenlikht <mexas@bristol.ac.uk> To: bsam@passap.ru, sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 7+ days of dogfood Message-ID: <201302101851.r1AIpNWs055658@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> In-Reply-To: <20130210164424.GA77092@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2013 08:44:24 -0800 From: Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> To: Boris Samorodov <bsam@passap.ru> Subject: Re: 7+ days of dogfood > > FFLAGS = -O2 -pipe -march=native -mtune=native > > I don't like using "=" for FLAGS at make.conf... > > > FFLAGS+= -funroll-loops -ftree-vectorize > > ... as well as defaults overriding. > FFLAGS are the options used while compiling Fortran. Having spent years contributing to and testing gfortran, I am fairly comfortable with these options. Do you recommend these FFLAGS settings to all users of gfortran (via lang/gcc4x)? For example, I use blas, lapack, slatec, atlas, etc. Should I use these FFLAGS too? Thanks Anton
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201302101851.r1AIpNWs055658>