From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 26 07:56:04 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-src@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 105C216A4CE; Sun, 26 Sep 2004 07:56:04 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rwcrmhc13.comcast.net (rwcrmhc13.comcast.net [204.127.198.39]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C583943D46; Sun, 26 Sep 2004 07:56:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from DougB@dougbarton.net) Received: from [192.168.0.5] (c-24-130-110-32.we.client2.attbi.com[24.130.110.32]) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc13) with ESMTP id <20040926075557015008sdhqe> (Authid: domain_name_tsar); Sun, 26 Sep 2004 07:56:03 +0000 Message-ID: <4156760D.9010509@DougBarton.net> Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2004 00:55:57 -0700 From: Doug Barton User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040811 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" References: <200409241342.i8ODg06a030839@repoman.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.84.2.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org cc: Ruslan Ermilov cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/share/mk bsd.libnames.mk src/lib/bind config.mk src/lib/bind/dns Makefile src/lib/bind/isc Makefile src/l X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2004 07:56:04 -0000 Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: > On Fri, 24 Sep 2004, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: >> What this really means is that all BIND libraries are now internal to >> buildworld (by default, unless WANT_BIND_LIBS is defined), and linked >> statically into various BIND executables. > > > these days that there is a dynalically linked base system why do it > the opposite way ? I am just curious ;-) The difference between what you describe and this situation is that the libraries that are linked in are not ever installed in /usr/lib. This is really no different than linking in any other static object when building a binary. HTH, Doug -- If you're never wrong, you're not trying hard enough