Date: Fri, 07 Mar 2014 10:42:44 +0100 From: "Ronald Klop" <ronald-lists@klop.ws> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, libarchive-discuss@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: bsdtar POLA change in 10.0? Message-ID: <op.xccilipxkndu52@ronaldradial.radialsg.local> In-Reply-To: <56BC2D25-7163-43A2-AB04-9A808AA98F85@gmail.com> References: <53171DAE.5070203@li.ru> <1394110822.21224.91297125.0B659AFB@webmail.messagingengine.com> <56BC2D25-7163-43A2-AB04-9A808AA98F85@gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 06 Mar 2014 19:43:28 +0100, Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> wrote: > > On Mar 6, 2014, at 6:00 AM, Mark Felder <feld@freebsd.org> wrote: > >> >> >> On Wed, Mar 5, 2014, at 6:50, Marat N.Afanasyev wrote: >>> I wonder why >>> >>> bsdtar --one-file-system >>> >>> suddenly started to skip archiving of mount-points? And no mention o= f >>> such behaviour change either in UPDATING or errata :( >>> >> >> --one-file-system >> (c, r, and u modes) Do not cross mount points. >> >> Isn't that what it's supposed to do? Skip any mounted filesystems? Wa= s >> it broken before? Or do I simply not understand the behavior you're >> seeing. > > Before it would archive the directory where the other filesystem was = > mounted, but nothing else. > > Now it doesn=E2=80=99t archive that directory. > > I believe this is a bug, since that directory (but nothing in it or = > under it) still belongs to this filesystem... > > Warner I cc'ed libarchive-discuss@googlegroups.com for more exposure to the iss= ue. Ronald.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?op.xccilipxkndu52>