From owner-freebsd-ports Sat Jan 19 4:26:26 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@hub.freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4287537B416; Sat, 19 Jan 2002 04:26:24 -0800 (PST) Received: (from sheldonh@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g0JCMsE22994; Sat, 19 Jan 2002 04:22:54 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sheldonh) Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2002 04:22:54 -0800 (PST) From: Message-Id: <200201191222.g0JCMsE22994@freefall.freebsd.org> To: tedm@toybox.placo.com, sheldonh@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: misc/33906: [PATCH] tic program as a port for easier SysV migration Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Synopsis: [PATCH] tic program as a port for easier SysV migration State-Changed-From-To: suspended->open State-Changed-By: sheldonh State-Changed-When: Sat Jan 19 04:22:12 PST 2002 State-Changed-Why: There's some form of consensus on the -arch list that tic(1) should be available from ports, and that the termcap file should contain a comment that references it. http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=33906 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message