Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 11 Mar 2002 09:12:40 -0700 (MST)
From:      "M. Warner Losh" <imp@village.org>
To:        rizzo@icir.org
Cc:        current@FreeBSD.ORG, ru@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: can someone explain this change to bsd.lib.mk ?
Message-ID:  <20020311.091240.73661063.imp@village.org>
In-Reply-To: <20020309004315.C16568@iguana.icir.org>
References:  <20020308111346.A12303@iguana.icir.org> <200203081926.g28JQGL04419@harmony.village.org> <20020309004315.C16568@iguana.icir.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message: <20020309004315.C16568@iguana.icir.org>
            Luigi Rizzo <rizzo@icir.org> writes:
: On Fri, Mar 08, 2002 at 12:26:16PM -0700, Warner Losh wrote:
: > In message <20020308111346.A12303@iguana.icir.org> Luigi Rizzo writes:
: > : The attached portion of the 1.100 -> 1.101 patch to src/share/mk/bsd.lib.mk
: > ...
: > : I wonder, how does a "make world" get around this problem
: > : (so i can try to reproduce the 'fix' in the picobsd script) ?
: > 
: > Make world gets around this problem by doing things in stages so that
: > the build tools are built first using the host environment, then the
: > target binaries are built using the host tools.
:                                       ^^^^
: you mean the newly built tools, right ?

Yes.

Warner

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020311.091240.73661063.imp>