Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 2 Sep 2001 00:05:51 +0400
From:      "Andrey A. Chernov" <ache@nagual.pp.ru>
To:        Alfred Perlstein <bright@mu.org>
Cc:        cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: src/lib/libc/stdio fseek.c stdio.c
Message-ID:  <20010902000551.B60969@nagual.pp.ru>
In-Reply-To: <20010901235726.A60969@nagual.pp.ru>
References:  <200109011121.f81BLSR89382@freefall.freebsd.org> <20010901135122.Z81307@elvis.mu.org> <20010901235726.A60969@nagual.pp.ru>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Sep 01, 2001 at 23:57:27 +0400, Andrey A. Chernov wrote:
> 
> You can, if you wish, f.e. To inform you more, I discuss basic principles
> of range control introduced in POSIX some time ago in -audit with sample
> patches. The FreeBSD problem is no range control at all. This is enough to
> start whole work. Every minor change simple can't be discussed. If you
> disagree with some of them - you are welcome with real and constructive
> objections.

Besides of it I found some bugs in error situations processing while
introduce checks - they are original bugs I am incluned to fix 
and not aware to do that initially.

To make your warm, _normal_ situations processing remain exact the same as
it was.

-- 
Andrey A. Chernov
http://ache.pp.ru/

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010902000551.B60969>