Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 30 Aug 2013 08:47:14 -0700
From:      Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
To:        David Chisnall <theraven@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        FreeBSD Current <current@FreeBSD.org>, John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org>, toolchain@FreeBSD.org, "freebsd-current@freebsd.org CURRENT" <freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org>, "Sam Fourman Jr." <sfourman@gmail.com>, Boris Samorodov <bsam@passap.ru>
Subject:   Re: GCC withdraw
Message-ID:  <20130830154714.GB87788@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
In-Reply-To: <A981C965-D625-458B-B0AB-171C983AEA42@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <20130822200902.GG94127@funkthat.com> <201308291057.43027.jhb@freebsd.org> <8F836479-BC3A-4679-A7AA-3BCDD34AE6C5@FreeBSD.org> <201308291344.25562.jhb@freebsd.org> <A981C965-D625-458B-B0AB-171C983AEA42@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 08:33:21AM +0100, David Chisnall wrote:
> On 29 Aug 2013, at 18:44, John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> wrote:
> 
> > default every time, that we're telling people not to use, won't help with 
> > that...
> > 
> > This is your worst argument as clang is known to take far longer than GCC
> > to build. :)
> 
> Not really.  Clang + gcc takes longer to build than just clang.

Building gcc is in the noise.  I've sent you number on this.
John is correct.  It takes much much longer to buildworld 
with clang.

-- 
Steve



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20130830154714.GB87788>