From owner-freebsd-toolchain@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 30 15:47:18 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: toolchain@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4848943; Fri, 30 Aug 2013 15:47:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (troutmask.apl.washington.edu [128.95.76.21]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7FECE2E06; Fri, 30 Aug 2013 15:47:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (localhost.apl.washington.edu [127.0.0.1]) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id r7UFlE8v087868; Fri, 30 Aug 2013 08:47:14 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: (from sgk@localhost) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) id r7UFlEhh087867; Fri, 30 Aug 2013 08:47:14 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sgk) Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2013 08:47:14 -0700 From: Steve Kargl To: David Chisnall Subject: Re: GCC withdraw Message-ID: <20130830154714.GB87788@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> References: <20130822200902.GG94127@funkthat.com> <201308291057.43027.jhb@freebsd.org> <8F836479-BC3A-4679-A7AA-3BCDD34AE6C5@FreeBSD.org> <201308291344.25562.jhb@freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: FreeBSD Current , John Baldwin , toolchain@FreeBSD.org, "freebsd-current@freebsd.org CURRENT" , "Sam Fourman Jr." , Boris Samorodov X-BeenThere: freebsd-toolchain@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Maintenance of FreeBSD's integrated toolchain List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2013 15:47:18 -0000 On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 08:33:21AM +0100, David Chisnall wrote: > On 29 Aug 2013, at 18:44, John Baldwin wrote: > > > default every time, that we're telling people not to use, won't help with > > that... > > > > This is your worst argument as clang is known to take far longer than GCC > > to build. :) > > Not really. Clang + gcc takes longer to build than just clang. Building gcc is in the noise. I've sent you number on this. John is correct. It takes much much longer to buildworld with clang. -- Steve