Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2013 08:42:06 +0200 From: Alexander Yerenkow <yerenkow@gmail.com> To: John Mehr <jcm@visi.com> Cc: Michael Ross <gmx@ross.cx>, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn - but smaller? Message-ID: <CAPJF9wnQCn=thNmZ5jhObjf4usCaQfdrYcTk6Tfd5v31_88bmQ@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <web-11149903@mailback3.g2host.com> References: <web-11636850@mailback4.g2host.com> <513E2DA5.70200@mac.com> <web-12282796@mailback4.g2host.com> <op.wts7cnaeg7njmm@michael-think> <web-11149903@mailback3.g2host.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I think that this keys shouldn't be included into binary.
svnup --ports
svnup --stable
svnup --security (or --release)
I'm proposing create somewhere, like in
/usr/share/svnup/aliases
with
ports<TAB>svn://svn.freebsd.org/blabla/....
stable<TAB>svn://svn.freebsd.org/blabla/ {uname-arch}/{uname-version}/ ....
etc.
So we will have some freedom to enhance and tweak it's behhavior while at
least in alpha stage.
--
Regards,
Alexander Yerenkow
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAPJF9wnQCn=thNmZ5jhObjf4usCaQfdrYcTk6Tfd5v31_88bmQ>