Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 23 Apr 2017 22:44:58 +0000
From:      "Thomas Mueller" <mueller6722@twc.com>
To:        freebsd-x11@freebsd.org 
Cc:        Hans Petter Selasky <hps@selasky.org>
Subject:   Re: Switching branches of freebsd-base-graphics with git
Message-ID:  <2D.D9.25473.18E2DF85@dnvrco-omsmta03>
References:  <f09ef027-2169-bd59-7482-d8fbb1bd371c@metricspace.net> <8d4600d1-8676-1284-3350-ebcba954efb6@selasky.org> <AB.97.09002.4581BF85@dnvrco-omsmta01> <638244e8-80d0-164c-1120-bc3278384af8@selasky.org> <D8.AB.09002.8FF6CF85@dnvrco-omsmta01> <3781d2b5-b340-df1f-fc67-f99e26d02507@selasky.org> <CAPS9%2BSs-CytAW_SULtnakvnJ90eiA8iva%2B3E9YN7E27uNDTsYA@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Hi,

> I use the regular ports tree, except for the xf86-video-intel driver from
> the freebsd-ports-graphics tree.
 
>-HPS

> I also use regular ports tree, but with xf86-video-modesetting driver,
> which seems more stable and renders firefox a lot quicker on my machine.

> Best regards
> Andreas

It looked like xf86-video-intel was newer in regular ports tree than in freebsd-ports-graphics, browsing Github in the case of freebsd-ports-graphics.

I also saw no xf86-video-modesetting driver in either regular ports tree or freebsd-ports-graphics.

But I saw xf86-video-modesetting in NetBSD pkgsrc in category x11.

Tom




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?2D.D9.25473.18E2DF85>