Date: Sun, 12 Jan 1997 05:45:47 -0800 (PST) From: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami) To: bugs@freebsd.org Cc: mita@jp.freebsd.org Subject: PR followup probs? Message-ID: <199701121345.FAA14564@baloon.mimi.com>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I'm not sure if this is reported here yet, but it seems like gnats is not recording followups correctly. For instance, this mail: === From: mita@jp.FreeBSD.org (MITA Yoshio) To: FreeBSD-gnats@freefall.freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freefall.freebsd.org cc: mita@jp.FreeBSD.org (MITA Yoshio) Subject: Re: ports/2311: A new ports collection for dserver (CDROM dictionary server) Date: Sun, 12 Jan 1997 22:25:04 +0900 >> Category: ports >> Responsible: freebsd-ports >> Synopsis: A new ports collection is created and waiting for committing. >> Arrival-Date: Sat Dec 28 17:50:01 PST 1996 Changed typo. Apply this patch please. begin 600 dserverports.patch.gz <etc> === sent as a followup to the "thanks for your report, we hope to get to it before the next millenium" mail, didn't register in the audit-trail of PR ports/2311. I also remember sending a mail to freebsd-gnats-submit, with the PR identification in the subject line, to send mail to the originator and also register it in the audit-trail -- as you may know, it ended up as a new PR. But I swear it used to work before. These should be fixed asap as we are dropping PR followups on the floor. Who updated freefall's gnats anyway? Satoshi
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199701121345.FAA14564>